&lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>"美国核复兴所需的铀 - 1：满足前所未有的需求」的评论</title>
	<atom:link href="https://redanalysis.org/zh/2024/11/27/uranium-us-nuclear-renaissance-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://redanalysis.org/zh/2024/11/27/%e9%93%80-%e7%be%8e%e5%9b%bd%e6%a0%b8%e5%a4%8d%e5%85%b4-1/</link>
	<description>战略前瞻与早期预警 ･ 政治与地缘政治风险 · 情景分析</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 17:30:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updateperiod>
	每小时	</sy:updateperiod>
	<sy:updatefrequency>
	1	</sy:updatefrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		评论者：darryl d Siemer		</title>
		<link>https://redanalysis.org/zh/2024/11/27/%e9%93%80-%e7%be%8e%e5%9b%bd%e6%a0%b8%e5%a4%8d%e5%85%b4-1/#comment-38044</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darryl d Siemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 17:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">https://redanalysis.org/?p=40466#comment-38044</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a note sent yesterday to another member of the little group of old, mostly retired, technical nerds that get together via ZOOM once per week. 

Thanks Dr. Forsberg, 

At this stage of the game, it seems silly to assume that a US “nuclear renaissance” shouldn’t be sustainable or rendered so with anything other than a PUREX-type reprocessing technology.  It’s also silly to assume that it should implemented with a few little converter-type reactors scattered all over the country rather than with clusters of big breeder reactors close-coupled to &#038; surrounding the fuel recycling plant rendering their fuel cycles sustainable/renewable.  Those clusters should &#038; almost surely would soon be surrounded with the also-new manufacturing facilities that could make America great again. 

The Russians developed/demonstrated what seems to be a reasonable sounding pyro-based reprocessing technology ~ two decades ago but still aren’t using it to refuel their commercial-scale BN-800 breeder reactor because they are more competent than we are about addressing their country’s technical issues.  The Pu within the vibropacked MOX fueling its big breeder(s) was recovered from “spent” LWR fuel via  a PUREX-like process , see      Microsoft Word - FR17 76 - Corrected.docx. 

Uranium for the U.S. Nuclear Renaissance - 1: Meeting Unprecedented Requirements - The Red Team Analysis Society  is  another “educated” opinion piece concluding that US decision makers &#038; their advisors should also quit pretending that it’d be a good idea to implement a “nuclear renaissance” with converter-type reactors, regardless of how “advanced”, modular, and otherwise special they might be*.

Again, a properly implemented renaissance wouldn’t require any newly discovered/mined/processed/enriched uranium whether it’s somehow been “American made” or purchased from foreigners .

*”educated” because it’s based upon facts &#038; realistic numbers, not faith, hopes, &#038; prayers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a note sent yesterday to another member of the little group of old, mostly retired, technical nerds that get together via ZOOM once per week. </p>
<p>Thanks Dr. Forsberg, </p>
<p>At this stage of the game, it seems silly to assume that a US “nuclear renaissance” shouldn’t be sustainable or rendered so with anything other than a PUREX-type reprocessing technology.  It’s also silly to assume that it should implemented with a few little converter-type reactors scattered all over the country rather than with clusters of big breeder reactors close-coupled to &amp; surrounding the fuel recycling plant rendering their fuel cycles sustainable/renewable.  Those clusters should &amp; almost surely would soon be surrounded with the also-new manufacturing facilities that could make America great again. </p>
<p>The Russians developed/demonstrated what seems to be a reasonable sounding pyro-based reprocessing technology ~ two decades ago but still aren’t using it to refuel their commercial-scale BN-800 breeder reactor because they are more competent than we are about addressing their country’s technical issues.  The Pu within the vibropacked MOX fueling its big breeder(s) was recovered from “spent” LWR fuel via  a PUREX-like process , see      Microsoft Word &#8211; FR17 76 &#8211; Corrected.docx. </p>
<p>Uranium for the U.S. Nuclear Renaissance &#8211; 1: Meeting Unprecedented Requirements &#8211; The Red Team Analysis Society  is  another “educated” opinion piece concluding that US decision makers &amp; their advisors should also quit pretending that it’d be a good idea to implement a “nuclear renaissance” with converter-type reactors, regardless of how “advanced”, modular, and otherwise special they might be*.</p>
<p>Again, a properly implemented renaissance wouldn’t require any newly discovered/mined/processed/enriched uranium whether it’s somehow been “American made” or purchased from foreigners .</p>
<p>*”educated” because it’s based upon facts &amp; realistic numbers, not faith, hopes, &amp; prayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		评论者：文章标题设计："美国核复兴所需的铀：满足前所未有的要求--第一部分" - Jean-Dominique Lavoix-Carli		</title>
		<link>https://redanalysis.org/zh/2024/11/27/%e9%93%80-%e7%be%8e%e5%9b%bd%e6%a0%b8%e5%a4%8d%e5%85%b4-1/#comment-36098</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Article Header Design: “Uranium for the U.S. Nuclear Renaissance: Meeting Unprecedented Requirements - Part 1” - Jean-Dominique Lavoix-Carli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 11:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">https://redanalysis.org/?p=40466#comment-36098</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The design on the site of The Red Team Analysis Society (click to expand) Access the Article [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The design on the site of The Red Team Analysis Society (click to expand) Access the Article [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>