Quelques réflexions sur #OccupyWallStreet

Plus qu'un billet structuré, voici quelques réflexions concernant le mouvement #OccupyWallStreet, notamment les arrestations à New York le samedi 24 septembre 2011, les effets connexes sur le traitement par les médias, et les articles et blogs que j'ai lus récemment non seulement sur cette opération spécifique mais aussi sur les mouvements et protestations antérieurs qui y sont liés. En effet, pour cet épisode de la lutte séculaire contre ceux qui détiennent la clé de la liquidité (le cash), l'origine de l'idée de lutter contre les banquiers et le pouvoir des marchés remonte à la Manifeste espagnol des Indignados (publié au plus tard le avant le 17 mai 2011), et aux récents événements en Islande.

Media, attention and … “martyrs”

Il est bon que les médias grand public commencent à prêter attention à ce qui se passe, mais, comme précédemment soulignéLorsque la manifestation #occupywallstreet a commencé sur #sept17, seulement CNNmoney et Al Jazeera were there and reported. Again, where were they for Europe? Obviously arrests in a symbolic place were needed to see wider coverage. As any student of political mobilization and revolution knows, getting “martyrs” – everything being equal – is a crucial time for movements to develop, getting support, coverage, attention, etc.

Thomas Jefferson contre les étiquettes de gauche ?

It seems that an interesting – still – low key struggle is emerging, at the level of ideas and legitimacy.

Some – the majority? – absolutely want to categorize the operation with what could be qualified of usual categories: anti-capitalist, left, leftist, etc. Yet, shouldn’t we wonder if those categories are not also or rather old, corresponding  to the word of the end of the 19th and 20th century and to the Cold War, and thus most probably outdated? Note that this categorization, very interestingly, is done both inside and outside the movement – the most vocal being maybe Tea Party supporters and established Marxist/leftist elements.

Meanwhile, within the “movement,” other participants either do not pay attention or start looking for legitimating references, e.g. Jefferson sur les banques privées (la légitimité est ici vue dans le cadre américain, mais Jefferson, en tant qu'enfant des Lumières, pourrait très facilement être adopté ailleurs, notamment en Europe). Le flux de tweets sur Jefferson a commencé le 17 septembre avec quelques citations favorites and also sometimes with mention of  blog posts, e.g. “Un repaire de vipères et de voleurs” by Scott Johnson, Sept 15, with no direct affiliation between posts and “movement.”

Vers un nouveau cadre normatif émergent ?

My take is that we are seeing here many things unfolding and coalescing: recuperation and hope for a renewal, thinking habit, fear to see part of one’s rhetoric and thus partisans stolen away, plain fear of what is happening, and, first and foremost, something new being created. We are most likely witnessing the first weak signals of the making of a new normative system. Hence, this ideological evolution must be followed. Even if this specific protest recedes, it does not mean it will completely die. It is most likely to come back again, transformed, stronger, better and differently defined, elsewhere. This is exactly what has already happened with the European movements of the Spring and Summer (although hardly documented), which, after the Arab (Winter-)Spring, and in conjunction with the markets’ evolution create the right conditions for transmission and mutation of ideas and their corollary, actions.

Very interestingly, right now, it would seem that all actors (from movements to institutions, including governments and international organizations) are unable to think clearly anything else than “less state” – in American parlance “less government,” although to think in these terms is fraught with complication. If this hypothesis is correct, then it would mean that all, probably unconsciously, abide, on the one hand, by the ultra-liberal ideology according to which less state is needed and that has dominated the world since the end of the Cold War and, on the other, have an ultimate faith in a Democracy that would not need a state (despite all the research done depicting a much more complex picture).

Shall we see with real life and concrete threats, with practical needs for mobilization and organization, with interactions within the “new opposition nexus” and between the latter and political authorities, ideas change, evolve and being re-imagined?

Publié par Dr Helene Lavoix (MSc PhD Lond)

Dr Hélène LavoixPh. D. Lond (relations internationales), est la présidente-directrice générale de The Red Team Analysis Society. Elle est spécialisée dans la prospective stratégique et l'alerte pour les relations internationales et les questions de sécurité nationale et internationale. Elle s'intéresse actuellement à la guerre en Ukraine, à l'ordre international et à la montée de la Chine, au dépassement des frontières planétaires et aux relations internationales, à la méthodologie de la SF&W, à la radicalisation ainsi qu'aux nouvelles technologies et à la sécurité.

Rejoindre la conversation

2 commentaires

  1. Bonjour Hélène,

    Interesting discussion presented here. I agree with your analysis of too many people are in the mode of “less state,” and even “Ron Paul” will fix the problems. Little attention to regaining self-responsibility and instilling values and truths into one’s life, a product of a dependent and mis-informed public, world-wide. However, as you mention…. noise is the first step before a new normative state….. the cycle must strengthen, retreat, strengthen more, retreat again, and continue this process until it can break out into the majority.

    I notice you mentioned that that the framework of central banking could be reviewed everywhere, and I agree wholeheartedly. My purpose of the article was to target American banking, as the US Dollar is the Reserve Currency of the world (though quickly fading…), which ties together much of the other western world currencies. That and I am from America, and most are not even willing to look at our own problems, no less the problems of the worldwide financial/currency/economic system. This is the source of the free man’s oppression, for this is the subconscious god of the western world. Doesn’t the G7 meeting to play currency intervention with one another spell conspiracy by real definition? Amazing the power of words, and how they have been used to protect the ongoing power-structure of the world.

    Don’t look for the media in the mainstream fashion. When ideas pop up in the media on the mainstream level, they are usually being carefully framed to portray a certain image. The real media is the alternative sources, opinions, and discussions. The real movement will come out of enough people who are willing to finally stand up. It will not happen with a group of mis-informed people protesting a segment of the corruption, it will be a small, tireless minority, that will not take no for an answer.

    Puissiez-vous vivre à une époque intéressante.

    Il semble que nous aurions le jackpot si nous considérions cela comme des possibilités plutôt que comme un horizon.

    Scott J

  2. Bonjour Scott,

    Thanks for your comment! I am not sure I see conspiracy behind the G7 – or G8 or Gn – but I am quite allergic to conspiracy theory, and furthermore this is a well documented cognitive bias. I would tend to see rather lack of foresight, search for quick fix solutions with incapacity to think anything else than winning the next elections and being solely interested in politician politics to the point that ruling and governing are seen as secondary…. but somehow this is more scaring to envision than a real conspiracy :)

    Je suis vraiment certain que nous allons tous vivre des moments très intéressants !

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Ce site utilise Akismet pour réduire les indésirables. En savoir plus sur comment les données de vos commentaires sont utilisées.