Human societies currently face dwindling resources and rising competition for them in the contemporary “resources order.” Thus, besides and in accordance with other ways to handle this challenge, new types and sources of resources are increasingly valuable and can make a strategic difference for polities, as well as for humanity as a whole. Meanwhile, if we are to ever learn from our worrying present, we must also, continuously, make sure that the extraction and use of those new potential resources will not have any unfavourable impact on the planet and its ecosystem, including this biodiversity to which we belong.* As has now been known since the end of the nineteenth century (Ifremer, les Nodules, 2012), mineral resources lie on the …
The remaining part of this article is for our members and those who purchased special access plans. Make sure you get real analysis and not opinion, or, worse, fake news. Log in and access this article.
2018 is likely to be overshadowed by the relationships between the U.S. on the one hand, a rising China and its strategic partnership with Russia on the other.
There is no fatality towards increased tension. It seems to be, however, more likely than a wise and cooperative approach, considering notably the overall transitional setting and the U.S. perspective and behaviour.
Most other issues will be impacted by the way these relationships develop.
Meanwhile, the increasing importance of Artificial Intelligence, its multiple uses and advances, could very well start very deeply transforming the world.
As we expected previously, the U.S. decision regarding Jerusalem not only polarised the situation, but also ended up as a test for U.S. power and influence. The testing nature of the situation was reinforced by the Americans threatening to cut American aid to countries, should the latter not side with the U.S. during the U.N. General Assembly vote for a resolution that “’demanded’ that all countries comply with Security Council resolutions regarding the status of Jerusalem, following an earlier decision by the United States to recognize the Holy City as the capital of Israel” (UN News) – a resolution that thus opposed the U.S. decision regarding Jerusalem.
Despite the threat, the “resolution [was] adopted by a recorded vote of 128 in favour to nine against (Guatemala, Honduras, Israel, Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Togo, United States), with 35 abstentions” (UN News). The U.S. thus lost.
As a result, the power and influence of the U.S. seems likely to have decreased.
This was not lost on China, as it held a third symposium, “of Israeli and Palestinian peace advocates” on 21 and 22 December 2017 in Beijing, where China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi was to “meet with the Palestinian and Israeli attendees” (Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying’s Regular Press Conference on December 21, 2017). The Foreign Ministry’s spokeperson futher added that “We are willing to continue offering constructive assistance to promote the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.” (Ibid.)
Meanwhile, the content of the articles on the matter in Global Times (the international edition for the very official People’s Daily), not only stressed the American loss of influence, but also underlined the ideal Chinese position to now step in as potential broker for future peace negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians.
It thus appears likely that China could step in to try replacing the U.S. as peace broker.
Should this happen, then China would have extended and asserted its influence, furthermore in a region where it had not been so far a major player – however being increasingly active there – while the U.S. would have, on the contrary, lost not only regional but also global influence.
Impact on Issues and Uncertainties
➘ U.S. influence and power in the Middle East ➘ Global U.S. influence and power
➚ Chinese influence and power in the Middle East ➚ Global Chinese influence and power
By an overwhelming majority, Member States in the United Nations General Assembly on Thursday “demanded” that all countries comply with Security Council resolutions regarding the status of Jerusalem.
Diplomats brushed aside what appeared to be a hastily organized pressure campaign by the White House, including last-minute threats by President Trump to cut off aid to countries voting for the resolution. “We will not be threatened,” Mr. Malki, one of several diplomats who spoke before the vote, told the General Assembly at an emergency meeting.
The symposium of Israeli and Palestinian peace advocates held in Beijing shows China’s will to promote peaceful solutions to Palestine-Israel issues, but experts say the complexity of Middle East politics leaves limited space for China.
An emergency UN General Assembly meeting passed a resolution calling for the US to drop its recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital as well as its decision to move the US embassy there. A total of 128 countries backed the resolution, nine voted against and 35 abstained.
The capability to use Alice in English could be developed in the (near-)future (Anadiotis, Ibid.). This would open the whole Yandex world to English speakers. Meanwhile this would also allow Yandex to get access to all the data of these very English speakers, so far the preserve mainly of Google, Apple and Amazon. Considering the current tensions between the U.S. and, with variations, NATO members, on the one hand, Russia on the other, one may only too well imagine the political paranoia that might then develop. Meanwhile, international competition among internet giants for users’ data, crucial to part of Deep Learning, as we shall see when explaining what is Deep Learning below, will very likely be intensified. On a more positive side, better understanding may also emerge as a result of non-Russian people discovering the Russian world. Nonetheless, this would also impact perceptions and thus international relations.
The AI world, notably in its Deep Learning component, is already here. It impacts everything, even though the extent and depth of its impacts are still hardly perceptible. We must understand Deep Learning to be able to live within this new world in the making, rather than only reacting to it.
This article thus focuses on Deep Learning (DL), the sub-field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that leads the current exponential development of the sector. As we seek to envision how a future AI-powered world will look and what it will mean to its actors, notably in terms of politics and geopolitics, it is indeed fundamental to first understand what is AI.
Previously, we presented AI, looking first at AI as a capability, then as a scientific field. Finally, we introduced the various types of AI capabilities that scientists seek to achieve and the ways in which they approach their research.
In this article, we shall first give examples of how Deep Learning is used in the real world. We distinguish two types of activities: classical AI-powered activities and totally new AI-activities, related to the very emergence of DL. In both cases we shall point out their revolutionary potential, impacting three major emerging functions within polities we had previously started identifying: AI management, AI governance and AI-power status, when AI is most likely to be, to the least, part of the relative power ranking for world actors (Helene Lavoix, “When Artificial Intelligence will Power Geopolitics – Presenting AI“, 29 November 2017, and Jean-Michel Valantin, “The Chinese Artificial Intelligence Revolution“, 13 November 2017, The Red (Team) Analysis Society).
Then, we shall take a deeper dive in the world of Deep Learning, taking as practical example the evolution of Google’s DeepMind AI-DL program initially developed to win against human Go masters: AlphaGo, then AlphaGo Zero and finally AlphaZero. After briefly presenting where DL is located within AI, we shall focus first on Deep Neural Networks and Supervised Learning. Second we shall look at the latest evolution with Deep Reinforcement Learning and start wondering if a new AI-DL paradigm, which could revolutionise the current dogma regarding the importance of Big Data, is not emerging.
Deep Learning in the real world, AI-governance and AI-power status
In a nutshell, Deep Learning (DL) is used to solve at best complex problems and functions and to take the best possible decisions regarding whatever question it is applied or to succeed in whatever field it is used.
For example, DL is increasingly used in the oil and gas industry. Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) developed the Smart LEak Detection (SLED) system, which “uses algorithms to process images from sensors scanning infrastructure” to “autonomously and accurately detect liquid hydrocarbon leaks and spills” (Maria S. Araujo and Daniel S. Davila, “Machine learning improves oil and gas monitoring“, 9 June 2017, Talking IoT in Energy). DNV GL has explored the use of DL (actually Microsoft Azur Machine Learning) to predict corrosion in pipelines and concluded that the “performance achieved” was “extremely promising” (Jo Øvstaas, “Big data and machine learning for prediction of corrosion in pipelines“, 12 Jun 2017, DNV GL). Had Italy and the UK benefited from such systems, both the “explosion at a major processing facility in Austria, which is the main point of entry for Russian gas into Europe”, and the “shutdown of the North Sea’s most important oil and gas pipeline system”, respectively on 11 and 12 December 2017, with major consequences for European supply (Jillian Ambrose and Gordon Rayner, “Gas shortage to push up bills after ‘perfect storm’ of energy problems“, 12 Dec 2017, The Telegraph), would most probably not have happened – assuming, of course, investments related to response had been done.
Further, DL is also increasingly part of the development of what is called “Smart Factory”. “In April 2017, PCITC and Huawei jointly announced a smart manufacturing platform… a core part of Smart Factory 2.0 within the Sinopec Group”. Notably, one of the capability of the platform “creates a ‘smart brain’ for petrochemical plants using deep learning and reasoning data.” (Huawei, “Huawei Joins Hands with PCITC to Embrace Smart Factory 2.0“, 13 Nov 2017, PRNewswire).
With NVDIA’s “Metropolis AI Smart Cities Platform”, Huawei’s video content management product supports and uses Deep Learning for “accurate face recognition, pedestrian-vehicle structuring and reverse image search”, also cooperating with the Shenzhen Police. Always with Metropolis, Alibaba Cloud’s City Brain uses AI for services such as “real-time traffic management and prediction, city services and smarter drainage systems”, improving for example “traffic congestion by as much as 11 percent in Hangzhou’s pilot district” (Saurabh Jain, “Alibaba, Huawei Adopt NVIDIA’s Metropolis AI Smart Cities Platform“, 25 Sept 2017, NVDIA blog).
Most famously, Deep Learning has been and is still used to play games such as go or chess, which allows for developing and testing new AI programs, in their architecture and algorithms. It is these programs, notably those developed by Google’s DeepMind, that we shall use below to further deepen our understanding of what is DL.
These may appear as classical cases of the way AI in its DL component may revolutionise already existing ways and practices.
For the very first time in human history, we could start thinking we could manage activities in near-perfect ways, as well as govern, in the multiple dimensions ruling demands, also in near-perfect ways. This, in itself, in a world of very imperfect humans is a revolution. It leads us to wonder about new issues such as how we, humans, with all our imperfections, with our multiple cognitive biases – i.e. mental errors which we are systematically doing but which were useful to survive and reach our current level of development (Richards J. Jr. Heuer,, Psychology of Intelligence Analysis, Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency, 1999) – are we to handle suddenly near-perfect activities? The very simple example of the self-driving car springs to mind immediately. The high number of crashes involving self-driving cars seems indeed to come from their inability to handle human imperfect driving (James Titcomb, “Driverless car involved in crash in first hour of first day“, 9 November 2017, The Telegraph).
However, new activities are also starting to appear, which are less classical to say the least. We have the case of learning platforms, where AI-DL agents learn and train (Cade Metz, “In OpenAI’s Universe, Computers Learn to Use Apps Like Humans Do“, 12 May 2016, Wired). For example, Universe, developed by OpenAI (the AI Lab backed by Tesla CEO Elon Musk) is a software platform where scientists can train their AI to interact with applications and programs, many of them open source (Ibid).
DeepMind Lab is a similar platform offered by Google’s DeepMind (Ibid). The older ImageNet, created in 2009, helped AI agents to learn to “see” (Ibid.). Is this the birth of a truly new AI-activity, similar to education, and which is to be part of the emerging AI-governance?
How will these two types of activities, classical AI-powered activities and new AI-activities, be integrated within AI-management and, in the area of politics that primarily concerns us, AI-governance? How are AI-management and AI-governance be organised? How will AI-governance interact with older remaining state, regime and government structures and processes?
Further, how will be organised a world that has been so far dominated by the quest for relative competitive advantage? Is the notion of competitive advantage even still relevant? What will happen when so far competing actors, from states to companies, are each using AI-DL in such a way that management and governance are all near-perfect? The first phase will most probably be a race to obtain this AI-DL advantage, while trying possibly to deprive others. But what will happen when two or more actors reach the same AI-stage of development? As the example give in introduction points out, shall will also see competition regarding who can access to citizens’ data rise?
This is nothing less than a completely new world that is possibly being created.
We shall, however, also have to wonder if and how such developments could fail.
We shall now take a deeper dive in the world of Deep Learning, which will allow us then, throughout the series, to better understand which activities are susceptible to be impacted by AI-DL, to start envisioning which new AI-activities could be born, as well as to map out how the likely race for AI-power status could take place and around which elements.
To continue reading, become a member of The Red (Team) Analysis Society.
If you are already a member, please login (don’t forget to refresh the page).
Full article 3368 words – approx. 9 PAGES
Incl. Members-only 1728 words / 5 Pages
Featured image: Neurons by Geralt, Pixabay, Public Domain – Cropped and re-colorized.
Silver, David Julian Schrittwieser, Karen Simonyan, Ioannis Antonoglou, Aja Huang, Arthur Guez, Thomas Hubert, Lucas Baker, Matthew Lai, Adrian Bolton, Yutian Chen, Timothy Lillicrap, Fan Hui, Laurent Sifre, George van den Driessche, Thore Graepel & Demis Hassabis, “Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge“, Nature550, 354–359, 19 October 2017, doi:10.1038/nature24270
Silver, David Aja Huang, Chris J. Maddison, Arthur Guez, Laurent Sifre, George van den Driessche, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Veda Panneershelvam, Marc Lanctot, Sander Dieleman, Dominik Grewe, John Nham, Nal Kalchbrenner, Ilya Sutskever, Timothy Lillicrap, Madeleine Leach, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Thore Graepel & Demis Hassabis, “Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search” Nature 529, 484–489, 28 January 2016, doi:10.1038/nature16961.
Resulting from the Google AI China Center’s opening and then operations, we estimate rising likelihoods to see :
Redrawing of the power map of the world along AI-power status lines
Rising competition regarding AI between U.S. and Chinese mammoth Companies
Human talents as stake in rising AI competition
“Forced” introduction of “open source” AI work in China
AI further progress and developments
Rising U.S. ability to stem the declining tide in terms of AI
Rising China’s influence in terms of AI
Rising China’s strength and capability to further develop AI
Strengthening capability of Chinese government and State to “keep in check” mammoth IT companies
Strengthening of Chinese political authorities
Increased China’s influence
China’s rise to top major power status
US decline from sole superpower to major power status (in relative terms, the U.S. capability to stem decline out of this specific signal does not compensate for the corresponding Chinese gains)
Escalating Tension U.S. – China
(The corresponding symbolic board is located after the “facts and analysis section)
Facts and analysis
On 13 December 2017 during the 13 and 14 December Google Developer Days event in Shanghai, Fei-Fei Li Chief Scientist AI/ML *Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning), Google Cloud announced the creation of the Google AI China Center, their “first such center in Asia”. the center will focus on basic AI research, and is located in Beijing to attract as many talents as possible.
It follows logically from Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman, Alphabet Inc. (Google) and Chair, Defense Innovation Board’s perception and assessment we singled out in a previous signal, according to which
“These Chinese people are good… It’s pretty simple. By 2020, they will have caught up; by 2025, they will be better than us; and by 2030, they will dominate the industries of AI.” (Eric Schmidt, Artificial Intelligence and Global Security Summit, CNAS, 1 Nov 2017)
As a result Google is positioning itself to be present on a market that they see as being dominant in the future. In the meantime, by attracting these Chinese AI talents, they also potentially slow the AI development of their Chinese competitors, which are Alibaba, Huawei, TenCent or Baidu.
As underlined by the Chinese official viewpoint, such a competition may only be healthy and stimulating and promote innovation at Chinese level, notably in a field that is so close to the heart of China, which aims at becoming leader in AI. The Google AI Center shows the attractiveness of China, and will help China attracting notably Asian talents to China, de facto favouring China’s goals.
Finally, Google is certainly an interesting actor for the Chinese government as it is allowed on the Chinese-Global AI board, in as much as it can be also possibly used to check the mammoth power garnered by the IT Chinese giants. For example, according to a Huawei Director there is a Chinese lag in “developing open-source software”. Assuming that this position is shared by the Chinese political authorities, allowing Google to enter the AI competition in China is likely to be a perfect way to force Chinese companies towards more open-source efforts (yet of course without overestimating Google open efforts, as we are dealing here with for profit companies).
The Chinese government and state thus ensures it strengthens its hand in remaining master of China’s destiny.
Impact on Issues and Uncertainties
? How threatening would a leadership of China in terms of artificial intelligence (AI) be perceived? What would mean escalating tensions between China and the U.S. involving AI and how would they play out? Are mammoth U.S. companies first global or American? (Critical uncertainties)
➚➚ Redrawing of the power map of the world along AI-power status lines
➚ Rising competition regarding AI between U.S. and Chinese mammoth companies ➚ Human talents as stake in rising AI competition
➚ “Forced” introduction of “open source” AI work in China ➚ AI further progress and developments
➚ U.S. ability to stem the declining tide in terms of AI ➚ China’s influence in terms of AI ➚ China’s strength and capability to further develop AI
➚ Capability of Chinese government and State to “keep in check” mammoth IT companies ➚ Strengthening of Chinese political authorities
➚ China influence ➚ China rise to top major power status ➙➚ US decline from sole superpower to major power status
Since becoming a professor 12 years ago and joining Google a year ago, I’ve had the good fortune to work with many talented Chinese engineers, researchers and technologists. China is home to many of the world’s top experts in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning.
Google announced Wednesday that it is opening an artificial intelligence (AI) research center in Beijing. This may serve as a springboard for China to attract top-ranking talent from around the world.
China has entered a “new era” where it should “take centre stage in the world” said President Xi Jinping during his opening speech at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (18-24 October) (Xi Jinping: “Time for China to take centre stage”, BBC News, 18 October 2017). This is poised to have formidable effects on the global economy as well as on the international currency system. Furthermore, to see this happening, we may wonder if the Chinese currency needs not becoming supreme in the international currency system. What is thus the current international state of play for the renminbi and which factors could preside to its future international reign?
Executive Summary
This article focuses on assessing the possibility to see China’s Yuan rivalling or replacing the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency, with all the consequent benefits.
As far as the current position of the “redback” is concerned, our analysis shows an increased internationalization as, for example, the Renminbi has been included in the basket of currencies on which the values of the IMF-issued Special Drawing Rights is based. The U.S. dollar, however, is still much more used in foreign-exchange trading and as a store of value at the official level. The greenback, all things being equal, is therefore likely to retain a dominant position in the foreseeable future.
However, keeping in mind that events rarely remain equal and follow expected trends, as first elements towards detailed scenario analysis for the future, we then analyse certain components of the Chinese economy that could help the renminbi in rivalling the international stance of the U.S. dollar. China’s extensive internal market and Beijing’s commercial depth are likely to help the renminbi in strengthening its position on global markets, while China’s financial markets still seem underdeveloped. This is why China’s economic authorities have announced that they will undertake dramatic reforms. Nonetheless, the facts that the judicial system is still controlled by the Communist Party and that the yuan is not fully convertible could hinder the possibilities for the renminbi to rival the dollar, at least in the short-term.
As a conclusion, the reform of the financial markets will be crucial to establish a truly global currency that could have the possibility to be on a par with the U.S. dollar, the two coexisting at the top of the currencies’ ladder. Other events, however, deserve further consideration for a fully detailed and final estimate.
Full article 2605 words – approx. 6 PAGES
Access for non-members or for your package is limited.
To continue reading, become a member of The Red (Team) Analysis Society.
If you are already a member, please login (don’t forget to refresh the page).
Featured image: China-CEEC Matchmaking Event 2017. Taken on the 27th of November, 2017 by Elekes Andor (Own work) [CC BY-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.
About the author: Leonardo Frisani (MA Paris) focuses currently on challenges to the US Dollar supremacy. Beyond that, his specialisation is in international security, and his main interests are in geopolitics, macroeconomics, climate change, international energy and history.
Main references:
Bank for International Settlements (2016) Foreign Exchange Turnover in April 2016, Triennal Central Bank Survey, Monetary and Economic Department: September 2016.
Blinken, A. J. (2017), “Trump is Ceding Global Leadership to China”, The New York Times, 8 November 2017.
Bradsher, K. (2015), “China’s Renminbi Is Approved by I.M.F. as a Main World Currency”, The New York Times, 30 November 2015.
Eichengreen, B. (2017), “The Demise of Dollar Diplomacy?”, Project Syndicate, 11 October 2017.
Eichengreen, B., Mehl, A,. and Chitu, L. (2012), “When did the dollar overtake sterling as the leading international currency? Evidence from the bond markets”, Vox, 23 May 2012.
Frankel, J. (2013), “The latest on the dollar’s international currency status”, Vox, 6 December 2013.
Frisani, L. (2017), “Challenges Looming Over the Petrodollar System”, The Red (Team) Analysis Society, 20 November 2017.
Galbraith, A. (2017), “Foreign holdings of Chinese debt up in July, Bond Connect impact limited”, CNBC, 3 August 2017.
Lavoix, H. (2017), “Signals: China’s Xi Jinping Thought, Real Economy And… Global Finance”, The Red (Team) Analysis Society, 24 October 2017.
Maavak, M. (2017), “My Say: Is China set to junk the global dollar hegemony?”, The Edge Markets, 28 September 2017.
Mutethya, E. (2017), “2nd China-Africa Investment Forum begins in Morocco”, China Daily, 28 November 2017.
Nakazama, K. (2017), “Communist China’s Third Era: 2012 to 2035?”, Nikkei Asian Review, 4 December 2017.
O’Neill, J. (2017), “What’s Really at Stake at the CCP Congress?”, Project Syndicate, 18 October 2017.
Prasad, E. (2017), “The Perils of a Trumped Fed”, Project Syndicate, 27 October 2017.
Ren, S. (2016), “Move Over Oil, Gold: 7 Of Top 10 Commodities Futures Are Now Traded In China”, Barron’s, 4 May 2016.
Roach, S. S. (2017), “Rethinking the Next China”, Project Syndicate, 25 May 2017.
Sanderson, H. (2016) “China launches renminbi-denominated gold benchmark”, Financial Times, 19 April 2016.
Spence, M. (2017), “The Global Economy’s New Rule Maker”, Project Syndicate, 29 August 2017.
Subacchi, P. (2017), “Why the Renminbi Won’t Rule”, Project Syndicate, 20 October 2017.
Valantin, J. (2015), “China and the New Silk Road: the Pakistani Strategy”, The Red (Team) Analysis, 18 May 2015.
Valantin, J. (2017), “Artificial Intelligence on the Chinese Silk Road”, The Red (Team) Analysis, 4 December 2017.
Wildau, G. and Lockett, H. (2017), “China pledges to open finance sector to more foreign ownership”, Financial Times, 10 November 2017.
Yao, K. and Glenn, E. (2017), “China’s central bank warns of ‘Minsky moment’ as economy powers ahead”, Reuters, 19 October 2017.
Yongding, Y. (2017), “Should China Deleverage?”, Project Syndicate, 29 June 2017.
Zhao, C. (2017), “Stop worrying about Chinese debt, a crisis is not brewing”, Financial Times, 4 December 2017.
On 9 December 2017, Libya’s Government of National Accord and Italy agreed to launch an operations center for combatting the migrant smuggling networks that facilitate the migrant flow across the Mediterranean. According to GNA Prime Minister Serraj, the operations center will include “representatives from the coastguard, the illegal migration department, the Libyan attorney general and the intelligence services, along with their Italian counterparts.”
With no details provided on how this center will operate, as well as seeing the GNA’s limited influence over militias, the effectiveness of this joint operations center and its impact on Libya’s spillover remains to be seen. Over the coming months, the center’s activities and any measurable effects will need to be monitored.
Impact on Issues
Critical uncertainty: capability to truly operationalise with efficiency the center on the shorter term
TRIPOLI (Reuters) – Libya’s U.N.-backed government agreed with Italy on Saturday to establish a joint operations room for tackling migrant smugglers and traffickers as part of efforts to curb migrant flows toward Europe, according to a statement.
On 6 December 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump declared that the U.S. recognises Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and, as a result will move its embassy there (see sources below), while also reasserting commitment to the peace process and specifying that the U.S. would support a two-state solution, if approved by both the Israelis and the Palestinians. Despite stress on peace, this declaration is highly likely to add fuel to the fire in the Middle East.
The U.S. itself is well aware of this danger as the State Department has asked “staff to defer all but essential travel to Israel, Jerusalem and the West Bank until 20 December”, according to Reuters.
It is highly likely that the fragile equilibrium that was very slowly being rebuilt despite, for example, the Hariri crisis, where most actors showed restraints, and despite the remaining difficulties related to working towards a constructive peace in Syria will be shattered.
Indeed, with this move, the U.S. forces all actors to take strong stances, which they cannot not take, but which are most probably not in the interest of a more peaceful region. These stances will also make subtle diplomatic negotiations and convergence of interests, such as those for example that developed between Saudi Arabia and Israel more difficult (see e.g. Signals: China enters the Fray in the Middle East; Israel Unprecedented Interview; Saudi Arabia…).
As a result, tension has further escalated in the Middle East. Meanwhile, Israel’s position could become not more but less secure.
Considering the discussions which preceded the American President’s declaration, where most Western and Arab allies warned America against this move, a position confirmed by the first international reactions to the American declaration, we may wonder in which way the new configuration now created serves, or, on the contrary, deserves, American power and influence. The U.S. could increasingly be seen as still powerful indeed, however a power that must be contained because also ready to sow turmoil by not considering all consequences.
The coming chains of actions reactions thus triggered will need to be closely watched.
Impact on Issues and Uncertainties
? Actions, notably of Muslim actors, beyond statements (critical uncertainties)
➚ ➃Middle East Tension ➙➚ Threat to Israel ➚ ? Test to U.S. influence and power
WASHINGTON – The US State Department issued a cable to all its diplomatic posts worldwide on Wednesday asking its officials to defer non-essential travel to Israel, Jerusalem and the West Bank until Dec. 20 according to a copy of the cable seen by Reuters.
CAIRO/AMMAN/BEIRUT (Reuters) – Arabs denounced President Donald Trump’s plan to move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem as a slap in the face but few thought their governments would do much in response.
Palestinian factions in the West Bank announced on Tuesday that they would carry out three days of protest across the West Bank over U.S. President Donald Trump’s expected decision regarding American policy on Jerusalem.
ANKARA A potential U.S. move to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital may cause indignation in the Islamic world and lead to new clashes in the region, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said on Dec. 6. “Any such false step may cause indignation in the Islamic world, dynamiting the ground for peace and igniting new tensions and clashes,” Erdoğan said on Dec.
President Donald Trump on Wednesday will recognise Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and set in motion the relocation of the U.S. Embassy to the ancient city, senior U.S. officials said, a decision that upends decades of U.S. policy and risks fueling violence in the Middle East.
On 15 May 2017, at the opening of the Belt and Road (B&R) Forum for International Cooperation, the Chinese President Xi Jinping declared:
“We should pursue innovation-driven development and intensify cooperation in frontier areas such as digital economy, artificial intelligence (AI), nanotechnology and quantum computing, and advance the development of big data, cloud computing and smart cities so as to turn them into a digital silk road of the 21st century. It is not just about physical connectivity but also digital connectivity. Internet of Things connectivity will be an integral part of the initiative. (“Full text of President Xi’s speech at opening of Belt and Road forum”, Xinhua net, 14/05/2017).
Five months later, on 17 October 2017, President Xi Jinping, during his speech given in front of the participants to the 19th congress of the Chinese Communist Party, also said:
“Deepen supply-side structural reform. […] Accelerate the development of advanced manufacturing sectors, promote the profound convergence of the Internet, big data, artificial intelligence and the real economy, foster new growth points and create new drivers in areas such as mid- and high-end consumption, innovative leadership, greenness and low-carbon, the sharing economy, modern supply chains, human capital services and other such areas. […] Strengthen the construction of basic infrastructure networks for irrigation, railways, roads, waterways, aviation, pipelines, the electricity grid, information, logistics, … » ” (“What did Xi Jinping say about cyberspace ?”, China Copyright and Media, October 17, 2017).
In other words, the highest levels of the Chinese government are currently coupling the development of the AI revolution with the deployment of the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative (or New Silk Road, a.k.a, previously the “One Belt, One Road” initiative). This grand strategy, launched in 2013, aims at creating a land and maritime international transport, trade, and finance Chinese infrastructure, which spans Asia, Russia, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America. Its aim is to find international reserves for the resources and products necessary to the development and enrichment of China (Jean-Michel Valantin, “China and the New Silk Road – From oil wells to the moon … and beyond”, The Red (Team) Analysis Society, July 6 2015). This endeavour is deployed on such a scale that it becomes a new political, economic and strategic force in the globalised world, for the Chinese national interest.
This coupling of the Belt&Road with the development of cyberspace and of artificial intelligence was furthered on 2 and 3 December 2017, during the Fourth World Internet Conference in Wuzhen. Then, remarks from the congratulatory letter by President Xi Jinping stated the necessity to build “a common future in the cyberspace”. On the margin of the conference, China, along with Asian, Middle Eastern and European countries – namely Serbia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Laos, Thailand, and Turkey – launched the “Digital Belt and Road”. The conference was also attended by Huawei, Beidou and Tencent, the Chinese Telecom and artificial intelligence and supercomputer giants, as well as by U.S. Apple and Tesla (Chen Qingqing, “Consensus grows at internet conference“, Global Times, 2017/12/3,).
In this article, we shall study how the spread of the B&R integrates the deployment of the “sinosphere” through the increasing use of AI as a tool to reinforce the efficiency of the international transport, information and communication infrastructures that actually shape the New Silk Road/B&R. Reciprocally, this will allow us to understand how the B&R is supporting the development of AI and how this dynamic is fostering the political influence of China. Then, we shall focus upon the political meaning of this coupling of the B&R grand strategy with the AI development.
Access for non-members or for your package is limited.
To continue reading, become a member of The Red (Team) Analysis Society.
If you are already a member, please login (don’t forget to refresh the page).
About the author: Jean-Michel Valantin(PhD Paris) leads the Environment and Geopolitics Department of The Red (Team) Analysis Society. He is specialised in strategic studies and defence sociology with a focus on environmental geostrategy.
Featured image: By Geralt, Pixabay, Public Domain.
Nato has released its latest 2017 Strategic Foresight Analysis Report.
According to General Denis Mercier, NATO Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (SACT) interviewed by Reuters, the report will be used with a SACT “companion report that maps out what NATO should do to respond to these trends in the spring” … “to inform the 2019 NATO political guidance”.
Some of the main points identified for the future are:
Increased instability
Increased likelihood of confrontation and war
Rising challenge to NATO and the West from emerging and resurgent powers (aka Russia and China)
Asymmetric demographic change
Rapid urbanization
Increasingly polarized societies
Continuous if not rising importance of new and emerging technologies, which offer enormous opportunities but also challenges and vulnerabilities
The impact of globalization
Rising importance of climate change and related cross cutting impacts, water security, food security and resource competition
BERLIN (Reuters) – China’s growing military strength and a resurgent Russia will pose growing challenges to the trans-Atlantic alliance in coming years, and NATO’s moves to bolster its capabilities could trigger a new Cold War-style arms race, a NATO report said.
GDPR, Privacy and Cookies
The Red Team Analysis Society uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites if you visit a page which contains embedded content from social media. Such third party cookies may track your use of the Red Team Analysis Society website.
If you click on "Accept", you accept our policy, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Red Team Analysis Society website and this will close this notice. Accept AllGDPR and Cookie Policy
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.